By Tony Attwood
The Guardian has come up with an interesting analysis of how each team that has had a season in the top division in England and Wales compares with all the others.
They have taken the number of points won (which means that teams who have competed since we went over to 3 for a win have an advantage over those who accumulated their totals prior to that date). And obviously only top division games are counted.
Here’s what they found.
Rank
|
Club
|
Games
|
Won
|
Drawn
|
Lost
|
Goal Diff
|
Points
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Liverpool | 3,901 | 1,800 | 974 | 1,127 | 1,640 | 5,220 |
2 | Arsenal | 3,900 | 1,753 | 1,009 | 1,138 | 1,500 | 5,159 |
3 | Everton | 4,284 | 1,746 | 1,070 | 1,468 | 734 | 5,055 |
4 | Manchester United | 3,544 | 1,688 | 869 | 987 | 1,569 | 4,975 |
5 | Aston Villa | 3,951 | 1,618 | 943 | 1,390 | 626 | 4,612 |
6 | Chelsea | 3,163 | 1,246 | 825 | 1,092 | 254 | 3,837 |
7 | Tottenham Hotspur | 3,160 | 1,275 | 774 | 1,111 | 438 | 3,827 |
8 | Manchester City | 3,385 | 1,291 | 836 | 1,258 | 140 | 3,744 |
9 | Newcastle United | 3,269 | 1,278 | 798 | 1,193 | 275 | 3,704 |
10 | Sunderland | 3,183 | 1,227 | 735 | 1,221 | 122 | 3,361 |
Arsenal are second not because of games played (although of course that helps) but because of the regularity with which we have hit the high spots.
In our first period in the first division, starting in 1904/5 we were a mid-table on average – only falling through the floor in the dreadful 1912/13 season. Upon our re-election to the first division we had a couple of bad season (1923-5) under Knighton, but then life began to get seriously better.
The full Guardian table is published here.
arsenal has never left the top division of english football unlike the other big teams which have check it out again!
Arsenal entered the Football League in the second division, gained promotion to the first, and were relegated in 1913.
Tony,
Very succinct and well put, as per Andy’s excellent article about the demotion.
http://www.blog.woolwicharsenal.co.uk/archives/5891/comment-page-1#comment-20689